Key result
A computationally efficient user adaptive QRS detection algorithm achieved an average positive prediction rate of 99.39% and sensitivity rate of 99.21% on 48 tapes of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database.
A novel user-adaptive QRS detection algorithm demonstrates high positive prediction and sensitivity rates while reducing computational complexity for wearable devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable efficient QRS detection in wearables; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
This paper presents a computationally efficient user adaptive QRS detection algorithm for wearable devices that achieves an average positive prediction rate of 99.39% and sensitivity rate of 99.21% evaluated on 48 tapes of MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The proposed user-specific QRS template avoids the complicate models and parameters used in existing algorithms while covers most situations for practical applications. The detection is based on the comparison of the correlation coefficient of the user-specific template extracted from individual user with the input ECG signal segment under detection. To reduce the computation, a novel one-target clustering is proposed to reduce the required loops from (K+1 )K/2 to 1 comparing to a K target group clustering; meanwhile, the detection judgement is triggered by the possible peaks to avoid a continuous time correlation calculation and can be taken as one-point FIR filter operation following by the dividing of the standard derivation of the input ECG signal segment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2018) studied Arrhythmia (n=48). User adaptive QRS detection algorithm based on one target clustering and correlation coefficient was evaluated on Positive prediction rate and sensitivity rate. A computationally efficient user adaptive QRS detection algorithm achieved an average positive prediction rate of 99.39% and sensitivity rate of 99.21% on 48 tapes of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: