Key result
TNF-α A allele blunts anti-inflammatory response to CPAP in coronary disease with OSA.
Why the study?
Having previously demonstrated higher circulating TNF-alpha levels in CAD and OSA patients carrying the TNF-alpha A allele, the authors addressed whether the TNF-alpha (-308G/A) gene polymorphism affects changes in TNF-alpha levels following CPAP therapy.
Does TNF-α (-308G/A) gene polymorphism affect changes in circulating TNF-α levels in response to CPAP treatment in adults with CAD and OSA?
RCT (n=239)
Randomized to CPAP or no-CPAP groups for ESS <10
Does TNF-α (-308G/A) gene polymorphism affect changes in circulating TNF-α levels in response to CPAP treatment in adults with CAD and OSA?
The TNF-α (-308G/A) polymorphism influences the inflammatory response to CPAP in CAD patients with OSA, suggesting a genetic modulation of treatment efficacy that may inform prognostic evaluation.
TNF-α A allele carriers may show attenuated inflammatory response to CPAP; extends genetic stratification research in CAD-OSA but should not yet change practice.
Rationale: We recently demonstrated that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) carrying the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) A allele had increased circulating TNF-α levels compared with the ones carrying the TNF-α G allele. In the current study, we addressed the effect of TNF-α (-308G/A) gene polymorphism on circulating TNF-α levels following continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the RICCADSA trial (NCT00519597) conducted in Sweden. CAD patients with OSA (apnea–hypopnea index) of ≥15 events/h and an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of <10 were randomized to CPAP or no-CPAP groups, and OSA patients with an ESS score of ≥10 were offered CPAP treatment. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and 12-month follow-up visits. TNF-α was measured by immunoassay (Luminex, R&D Systems). Genotyping of TNF-α-308G/A (single nucleotide polymorphism Rs1800629) was performed by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results: In all, 239 participants (206 men and 33 women; mean age 64.9 (SD 7.7) years) with polymorphism data and circulating levels of TNF-α at baseline and 1-year follow-up visits were included. The median circulating TNF-α values fell in both groups between baseline and 12 months with no significant within- or between-group differences. In a multivariate linear regression model, a significant change in circulating TNF-α levels from baseline across the genotypes from GA to GA and GA to AA (standardized β-coefficient −0.129, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.82; −0.12; p = 0.025) was observed in the entire cohort. The association was more pronounced among the individuals who were using the device for at least 4 h/night (n = 86; standardized β-coefficient −2.979 (95% CI −6.11; −1.21); p = 0.004)), whereas no significant association was found among the patients who were non-adherent or randomized to no-CPAP. The participants carrying the TNF-α A allele were less responsive to CPAP treatment regarding the decline in circulating TNF-α despite CPAP adherence (standardized β-coefficient −0.212, (95% CI −5.66; −1.01); p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our results suggest that TNF-α (-308G/A) gene polymorphism is associated with changes in circulating TNF-α levels in response to CPAP treatment in adults with CAD and OSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çelik et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea (n=239). CPAP treatment vs. No CPAP was evaluated on Change in circulating TNF-α levels from baseline to 12 months (standardized β-coefficient -0.212, 95% CI -5.66 to -1.01, p=0.005). In adults with coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea, participants carrying the TNF-α A allele had a significantly blunted decline in circulating TNF-α levels in response to 12 months of CPAP treatment despite adherence (standardized β-coefficient -0.212, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: