Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A pattern-recognition analysis using the ADAPT system was performed on a set of 9-anilinoacridine antitumor agents, to determine whether computer-generated descriptors could be used to separate active from inactive compounds. A training set of 213 compounds was chosen by random computer selection from a list of 776 structures. Maximal increase in life span at the LD10 dosage, a response which is difficult to model using traditional Hansch analysis, was used as the measure of biological activity. A set of 18 molecular descriptors, including fragment, substructure environment, and physicochemical property descriptors (molar refraction, partial electronic charge) was identified which could correctly classify 94% of the compounds in the training set (97% of active and 85% of inactive compounds). Eight of the inactive compounds that were misclassified contained amino substituents, suggesting a role for ionization. The weight vector that was obtained from the training set was applied to a prediction set of 50 compounds that were not included in the original analysis and to a set of 69 structures drawn from the recent literature. The prediction set results, ranging from 73 to 86% correct, were lower than those of the training set, but they clearly indicate that pattern-recognition techniques can be useful in the screening of proposed or already existing agents and especially useful for the identification of active compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: