Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents an approach for pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements. Pragmatic ambiguities depend on the context of a requirement, which includes the background knowledge of the reader: different backgrounds can lead to different interpretations. The presented approach employs a graph-based modelling of the background knowledge of different readers, and uses a shortest-path search algorithm to model the pragmatic interpretation of a requirement. The comparison of different pragmatic interpretations is used to decide if a requirement is ambiguous or not. The paper also provides a case study on real-world requirements, where we have assessed the effectiveness of the approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrari et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 7 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: