This study examines the influence of confirmation bias in Al-Ghazali's critique of philosophers in Tahafut al-Falasifah. Confirmation bias, a cognitive tendency to seek and interpret information that aligns with pre-existing beliefs, may have influenced Al-Ghazali's critique of Peripatetic philosophy. The analysis focuses on how Al-Ghazali's epistemological framework, emphasizing divine revelation over reason, shaped his argumentation. This paper reveals how confirmation bias plays a role in his selective interpretation of philosophical arguments. Ultimately, the study offers insights into the relationship between theology and philosophy in classical Islamic thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masykur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: