Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Capturing trustworthiness, reputation, and reliability of Semantic Web data manipulated by SPARQL requires researchers to represent adequate provenance information, usually modeled as source data annotations and propagated to query results along with a query evaluation. Alternatively, abstract provenance models can capture the relationship between query results and source data by taking into account the employed query operators. The authors argue the benefits of the latter for settings in which query results are materialized in several repositories and analyzed by multiple users. They also investigate how relational provenance models can be leveraged for SPARQL queries, and advocate for new provenance models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theoharis et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: