Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous article Next article A Search for Optimum Methods for the Numerical Integration of Ordinary Differential EquationsT. E. HullT. E. Hullhttps://doi.org/10.1137/1009106PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAbout[1] G. Birkhoff, Numerical integration of reactor dynamics equations, Symposium on the Numerical Solution of Nonlinear Differential Equations, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1966 0202.45402 Google Scholar[2] Roland Bulirsch and , Josef Stoer, Numerical treatment of ordinary differential equations by extrapolation methods, Numer. Math., 8 (1966), 1–13 10.1007/BF02165234 MR0191095 0135.37901 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[3] J. C. Butcher, A modified multistep method for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 12 (1965), 124–135 MR0178573 0125.07102 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[4] J. C. Butcher, Implicit Runge-Kutta processes, Math. Comp., 18 (1964), 50–64 MR0159424 0123.11701 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[5] Germund Dahlquist, Convergence and stability in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations, Math. Scand., 4 (1956), 33–53 MR0080998 0071.11803 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] William B. Gragg, On extrapolation algorithms for ordinary initial value problems, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. Ser. B Numer. Anal., 2 (1965), 384–403 MR0202318 0135.37803 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] William B. Gragg and , Hans J. Stetter, Generalized multistep predictor-corrector methods, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 11 (1964), 188–209 MR0161476 0168.13803 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[8] Peter Henrici, Discrete variable methods in ordinary differential equations, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1962xi+407 MR0135729 0112.34901 Google Scholar[9] Peter Henrici, Error propagation for difference method, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York-London, 1963vii+73 MR0154416 0171.36104 Google Scholar[10] T. E. Hull and , A. L. Creemer, Efficiency of predictor-corrector procedures, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 10 (1963), 291–301 MR0154419 0115.34603 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[11] T. E. Hull and , R. L. Johnston, Optimum Runge-Kutta methods, Math. Comp., 18 (1964), 306–310 MR0165700 0118.32901 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[12] T. E. Hull and , A. C. R. Newbery, Integration procedures which minimize propagated errors, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math., 9 (1961), 31–47 10.1137/0109004 MR0120770 0107.10802 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[13] T. E. Hull and , A. C. R. Newbery, Corrector formulas for multi-step integration methods, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math., 10 (1962), 351–369 10.1137/0110026 MR0152150 0108.12702 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[14] J. Kuntzmann, Deux formules optimales du type de Runge-Kutta, Chiffres, 2 (1959), 21–26 MR0136080 0094.11302 Google Scholar[15] J. D. Lambert and , B. Shaw, A method for the numerical solution of y =f(x,\,y) based on a self-adjusting non-polynomial interpolant, Math. Comp., 20 (1966), 11–20 MR0189252 0133.38205 ISIGoogle Scholar[16] Anthony Ralston, Runge-Kutta methods with minimum error bounds, Math. Comp., 16 (1962), 431–437, corrigendum, 17 (1963), p. 488 MR0150954 0105.31903 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] J. Barkley Rosser, A Runge-Kutta for all seasons, SIAM Rev., 9 (1967), 417–452 10.1137/1009069 MR0219242 0243.65041 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[18] N. F. Stewart, private communication Google Scholar[19] J. A. Zonneveld, Automatic numerical integration, Mathematical Centre Tracts, No. 8, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1964, 110– MR0171381 0139.31901 Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresRelatedReferencesCited ByDetails Construction of explicit runge-kutta pairs with stiffness detectionMathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 40, No. 11-12 | 1 Dec 2004 Cross Ref Trajectory propagation using information on periodicityAIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit | 22 August 2012 Cross Ref Runge-Kutta research at TorontoApplied Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 22, No. 1-3 | 1 Nov 1996 Cross Ref Adams-type methods with increased ranges of stabilityComputers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 4, No. 4 | 1 Jan 1978 Cross Ref Corrector methods with increased ranges of stabilityComputers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 3, No. 3 | 1 Jan 1977 Cross Ref The Construction of Numerical Subroutine LibrariesW. J. CodySIAM Review, Vol. 16, No. 1 | 18 July 2006AbstractPDF (1494 KB)Comparing Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential EquationsT. E. Hull, W. H. Enright, B. M. Fellen, and A. E. SedgwickSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 4 | 14 July 2006AbstractPDF (3348 KB)THE PAPERSMathematical Software | 1 Jan 1971 Cross Ref 2 Runge-Kutta and Allied Single-Step MethodsNumerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations | 1 Jan 1971 Cross Ref Volume 9, Issue 4| 1967SIAM Review627-777 History Submitted:11 July 1966Published online:18 July 2006 InformationCopyright © 1967 Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsPDF Download Article & Publication DataArticle DOI:10.1137/1009106Article page range:pp. 647-654ISSN (print):0036-1445ISSN (online):1095-7200Publisher:Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. E. Hull (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: