Key result
Activity-based costing revealed significant cost differences compared to current methods, including a 96% increase for PET scans ($463) and a 52% decrease for bone and thyroid scans ($114).
Why the study?
Does activity-based costing provide more accurate procedure costs compared to current costing methods in a nuclear medicine unit?
Does activity-based costing provide more accurate procedure costs compared to current costing methods in a nuclear medicine unit?
Activity-based costing provides more accurate procedure costs in a nuclear medicine unit, highlighting operational time and drug costs as primary cost drivers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Activity-based costing may refine nuclear medicine cost estimates; leaves open whether it should replace current methods without validation.
Previous studies have shown the feasibility of using activity-based costing (ABC) in hospital environments. However, many of these studies discuss the general applications of ABC in health-care organizations. This research explores the potential application of ABC to the nuclear medicine unit (NMU) at a teaching hospital. The finding indicates that the current cost averages 236.11 US dollars for all procedures, which is quite different from the costs computed by using ABC. The difference is most significant with positron emission tomography scan, 463 US dollars (an increase of 96%), as well as bone scan and thyroid scan, 114 US dollars (a decrease of 52%). The result of ABC analysis demonstrates that the operational time (machine time and direct labour time) and the cost of drugs have the most influence on cost per procedure. Clearly, to reduce the cost per procedure for the NMU, the reduction in operational time and cost of drugs should be analysed. The result also indicates that ABC can be used to improve resource allocation and management. It can be an important aid in making management decisions, particularly for improving pricing practices by making costing more accurate. It also facilitates the identification of underutilized resources and related costs, leading to cost reduction. The ABC system will also help hospitals control costs, improve the quality and efficiency of the care they provide, and manage their resources better.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suthummanon et al. (2005) studied Nuclear medicine procedures. Activity-based costing (ABC) vs. Current cost method was evaluated on Cost per procedure. Activity-based costing revealed significant cost differences compared to current methods, including a 96% increase for PET scans ($463) and a 52% decrease for bone and thyroid scans ($114).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: