Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines food choices impacting weight management, highlighting key motivations in successful maintainers.
Background The present study aimed to examine motivations for food choice among long‐term weight loss maintainers (WLM) in a widely used commercial weight management program. Methods A cross‐sectional study was employed where determinants of food choice were measured in the USA using validated scales: Food Choice Questionnaire, Consideration of Future Consequences, and Eating in the Absence of Hunger. Participants were 3806 WLM following a commercial weight management program (WW International, Inc.) who had maintained a weight loss ≥ 9.1 kg (mean 24.7 kg) for 3.3 years and had a body mass index (BMI) of 27.6 kg m 2 . A control group of weight stable individuals with obesity (controls; n = 519) had a BMI of 38.9 kg m 2 and a weight change < 2.3 kg over the previous 5 years. Results WLM vs. controls made food decisions more based on health (18.9 vs. 16.3; η p 2 = 0.052) and weight control (9.9 vs. 7.5; η p 2 = 0.16) and less based on price (8.4 vs. 9.1; η p 2 = 0.10). WLM also scored higher than controls with respect to considering future consequences of behaviours (44.3 vs. 38.4; η p 2 = 0.060) and reported less external eating in the absence of hunger (7.1 vs. 7.5; η p 2 = 0.058). Standard canonical coefficients indicated that making food choices based on weight (0.717) with less value placed on price (−0.33) and greater consideration of future consequences (0.262) contributed independently and most (overall r = 0.593; p = 0.0001) to discriminating WLM from controls. Conclusions In a widely used commercial weight management program, successful WLM reported food decisions based more on weight and less on price and considered future consequences of current behaviours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: