Key result
Failing hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy exhibited a shift in the distribution of fiber inclination angles to a more oblique orientation compared to normal hearts.
Why the study?
Is myofiber orientation altered in excised human hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy compared to normal hearts when assessed by diffusion tensor MRI?
Observational (n=8)
Is myofiber orientation altered in excised human hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy compared to normal hearts when assessed by diffusion tensor MRI?
Diffusion tensor MRI reveals a shift to a more oblique myofiber orientation in failing hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy, providing insight into myocardial architectural remodeling.
Myofiber reorientation in DCM models warrants no clinical change; leaves open its mechanistic role and human translation.
The helical arrangement of cardiac myofibers is responsible for equalizing myofiber strain and maximizing the ejection fraction in a normal heart. In one form of chronic heart failure (CHF) known as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), the heart dilates, wall stress is increased, and ventricular pump function is reduced. We investigated whether myofiber orientation is altered in DCM by quantifying fiber orientation in excised human hearts using diffusion tensor MRI. Normal hearts (n=4) and failing hearts (n=4) were imaged in the plane of the cardiac short-axis at the base and mid-ventricular levels. There was a shift in the distribution of fiber inclination angles in the CHF hearts to a more oblique orientation at both the base and mid-ventricular levels. These preliminary results provide information about remodeling of the myocardial architecture in heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eggen et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=8). Dilated cardiomyopathy vs. Normal hearts was evaluated on Distribution of fiber inclination angles. Failing hearts with dilated cardiomyopathy exhibited a shift in the distribution of fiber inclination angles to a more oblique orientation compared to normal hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: