Why the study?
Does implementing a PDSA cycle-based handover procedure reduce the number of patients transferred without proper handover?
Does implementing a PDSA cycle-based handover procedure reduce the number of patients transferred without proper handover?
Using a PDSA cycle to redesign and enforce handover documentation improved patient handover rates between medical units.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support local PDSA handover improvements; leaves open generalizability and need for controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Medical admission units are continuously under pressure to move patients off the unit to outlying medical wards and allow for new admissions. In a typical district general hospital, doctors working in these medical wards reported that, on average, three patients each week arrived from the medical admission unit before any handover was received, and a further two patients arrived without any handover at all. A quality improvement project was therefore conducted using a 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' cycle model for improvement to address this issue. METHOD: P - Plan: as there was no framework to support doctors with handover, a series of standard handover procedures were designed. D - Do: the procedures were disseminated to all staff, and championed by key stakeholders, including the clinical director and matron of the medical admission unit. RESULTS: S - STUDY: Measurements were repeated 3 months later and showed no change in the primary end points. A - ACT: The post take ward round sheet was redesigned, creating a checkbox for a medical admission unit doctor to document that handover had occurred. Nursing staff were prohibited from moving the patient off the ward until this had been completed. This later evolved into a separate handover sheet. Six months later, a repeat study revealed that only one patient each week was arriving before or without a verbal handover. CONCLUSIONS: Using a 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' business improvement tool helped to improve patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luther et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: