Key result
LBBB linked to ~2.8-fold higher cardiomyopathy risk in patients with muscular dystrophy.
Why the study?
Heart disease is a leading cause of mortality in muscular dystrophy, but standard imaging is challenging due to physical limitations.
Does the presence of LBBB or fQRS on 12-lead ECG indicate cardiomyopathy in patients with muscular dystrophy?
Cohort (n=203)
No
Does the presence of LBBB or fQRS on 12-lead ECG indicate cardiomyopathy in patients with muscular dystrophy?
Relative Risk: 2.75 (95% CI 2.14–3.53)
p-value: p=<0.001
A standard 12-lead ECG is an accessible and effective screening tool, where findings of LBBB and fQRS can identify muscular dystrophy patients at high risk for cardiomyopathy who need further imaging and intervention.
LBBB on ECG was associated with cardiomyopathy in muscular dystrophy; supports targeted imaging but leaves open prospective validation before screening adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Heart disease remains a leading cause of mortality in patients with muscular dystrophy (MD), and cardiac assessment by standard imaging modalities is challenging due to the prominence of physical limitations. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study of 169 MD patients and 34 negative control patients, we demonstrate the clinical utility of a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as an effective modality for the assessment of cardiac status in patients with MD. We assessed the utility of conventional criteria for electrocardiogram-indicated left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) as well as ECG morphologies. RESULTS: Cornell voltage, Cornell voltage-duration, Sokolow-Lyon voltage, and Romhilt-Estes point score criteria demonstrated low sensitivity and minimal positive predictive value for ECG-LVH when compared with cardiac imaging. Patients with LBBB had a high probability of a cardiomyopathy (relative risk [RR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14-3.53; p < .001), and patients with QRS fragmentation (fQRS) had a high probability of a cardiomyopathy (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.20-2.59; p = .004), requiring cardiac medication and device intervention. We found that an R/S ratio >1 in V1 and V2 is highly specific (specificity, 0.89; negative predictive value [NPV], 0.89 and specificity, 0.82; NPV, 0.89, respectively) for patients with dystrophinopathies compared with other types of MD. CONCLUSION: The identification of LBBB and fQRS was linked to cardiomyopathy in patients with MD, while ECG-LVH was of limited utility. Importantly, these findings can be applied to effectively screen a broad cohort of MD patients for structural heart disease and prompt further evaluation and therapeutic intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikhanj et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Muscular Dystrophy (n=203). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) vs. Absence of LBBB was evaluated on Probability of a cardiomyopathy (defined as LVEF <55% or LVEDVi >105 mL/m²) (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.14-3.53, p=<0.001). In patients with muscular dystrophy, the presence of left bundle branch block on 12-lead ECG was strongly associated with a higher probability of cardiomyopathy (RR 2.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: