Why the study?
Are clinical criteria adequate for the selection of proper candidates for mitral commissurotomy in patients with mitral stenosis?
Are clinical criteria adequate for the selection of proper candidates for mitral commissurotomy in patients with mitral stenosis?
Clinical criteria alone are inadequate for selecting patients for mitral commissurotomy; objective physiologic measurements, particularly of pulmonary hypertension, are necessary to confirm significant mitral block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May render clinical criteria insufficient for mitral commissurotomy selection; leaves open the value of physiologic confirmation in candidate assessment.
Of 60 patients with mitral stenosis referred as proper candidates for commissurotomy, less than half (27) proved suitable after further study. One half of these (13) had a good postoperative result as judged not only clinically but by objective physiologic measurements. The latter represent the best criteria for the effects of surgery since subjective impressions may be unreliable. Eight subjects originally advised to undergo surgery would now be rejected inasmuch as myocardial insufficiency and not mitral block was their predominant difficulty. Clinical criteria appear as yet inadequate for the selection of the proper candidate for mitral commissurotomy, as there is no good clinical means of establishing in every instance the presence of pulmonary hypertension which remains the best evidence of a significant degree of mitral block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FERRER et al. (1955) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: