Key result
First-quarter birth linked to ~2.3-fold higher odds of sports academy selection versus fourth-quarter birth.
Why the study?
The relationship between birth quarter distribution and physiological characteristics related to athletic skills in adolescent sport academy students had not been fully investigated.
Does being born early in the year improve the odds of selection to an elite sports academy in adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=138)
No
Does being born early in the year improve the odds of selection to an elite sports academy in adolescents?
Odds Ratio: 2.3 (95% CI 1.1–4.7)
p-value: p=0.01
Adolescent athletes born earlier in the year have a significant selection advantage for sports academies, highlighting a relative age effect that persists despite uniform performance on most physiological tests.
Relative age may bias sports academy selection; leaves open causal mechanisms and need for prospective confirmation.
The relationship between birth quarter distribution and physiological characteristics related to athletic skills, in adolescent sport academy students has not been fully investigated. In a cross-sectional study, we recruited 86 boys and 52 girls aged 12-14 years during their first term at a sport academy school. We measured body size, cardiac size, pulmonary function, body composition, lower body power, cardiorespiratory fitness parameters, and running endurance by standard methods and analyzed these estimates in relation to birth quarter by ANOVA. Birth quarter distribution in our cohort was compared with birth quarter distribution in the same ages in the whole of Sweden and analyzed by logistic regression. The academy had an overrepresentation of students born in the first quartile of the year compared to those born in the last quartile (odds ratio 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1-4.7)). When comparing the physiological characteristics between birth quarters, uniformity is prominent since out of 26 performed physiological and anthropometric tests only four showed statistically significant group differences. We thus believe that the selection process to the sport academy favours athletes with higher chronological age, i.e., a so-called relative age effect is present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ek et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Sport academy adolescents (n=138). Birth in the first quarter of the year (Q1) vs. Birth in the last quarter of the year (Q4) was evaluated on Selection to the sports academy based on birth quarter (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, p=0.01). Being born in the first quarter of the year increased the odds of selection to a sport academy school by 2.3-fold compared to being born in the last quarter, demonstrating a significant relative age effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: