Why the study?
Does bipolar ablation using CS electrode rings as dispersive electrodes improve transmural lesion creation compared to unipolar ablation in excised pig hearts?
Does bipolar ablation using CS electrode rings as dispersive electrodes improve transmural lesion creation compared to unipolar ablation in excised pig hearts?
Bipolar ablation using CS electrode rings as dispersive electrodes is highly effective for creating transmural LA-CS lesions in an ex vivo model, though it may increase the risk of steam pops.
Bipolar ablation may aid transmural lesions in ex vivo models; leaves open clinical translation and safety in AF ablation.
The stepwise approach to radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) can include ablation of the coronary sinus (CS) by RF delivery at the left atrium (LA) and/or within the CS. In both cases, the energy is applied between the tip electrode of a percutaneous catheter and a dispersive electrode on the body surface. We explored the feasibility of using the electrode rings of a diagnostic catheter placed in the CS as dispersive electrode(s) for RF delivery within the LA and compared this technique to an established CS ablation method.Excised pig hearts were superfused with a pulsatile saline flow. Bipolar ablation was performed between a saline-irrigated (20 mL/minute) 4-mm tip electrode placed in the LA adjacent to the CS and 7 electrode rings of a 6F, septapolar, 4-mm nonirrigated electrode placed within the CS adjacent to the LA endocardial electrode. Unipolar ablation was performed between the endocardial electrode and dispersive electrode. A continuous transmural lesion was produced in 6/8 (75%) attempts with bipolar ablation, but in 0/6 (0%) attempts with unipolar ablation. However, the incidence of steam pop tended to be increased with bipolar ablation.Bipolar ablation of the CS appears to be highly effective for creating a transmural LA-CS lesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohkubo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: