Key result
Ivabradine in combination with beta-blockers significantly reduced heart rate by 12.6 bpm from baseline within 1 month in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Why the study?
Most patients with angina require combination therapy to manage symptoms, but the efficacy and safety of adding ivabradine in patients who remained symptomatic on beta-blockers required systematic evaluation.
Does ivabradine added to beta-blockers improve heart rate and angina symptoms in patients with stable angina pectoris inadequately controlled by beta-blockers?
Meta-Analysis (n=6,821)
Does ivabradine added to beta-blockers improve heart rate and angina symptoms in patients with stable angina pectoris inadequately controlled by beta-blockers?
Mean Difference: -12.6
p-value: p=<0.0001
The addition of ivabradine to beta-blockers in patients with stable angina safely and effectively reduces heart rate, angina attacks, and nitrate consumption within 1 to 4 months.
Supports adding ivabradine to beta-blockers for inadequately controlled stable angina; confirms rapid heart rate reduction in meta-analysis.
Beta-blockers are recommended by the European Society of Cardiology as first-line antianginal therapy for reducing heart rate (HR) and symptoms in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, despite a lack of data showing superiority to other antianginal agents. Most patients with angina pectoris require combination therapy to manage symptoms, with a second-line agent chosen to manage the predominant cardiovascular problem. Ivabradine, a selective sinus node If channel inhibitor shown to reduce HR and protect against anginal symptoms, has previously demonstrated noninferior anti-ischaemic and antianginal efficacy to beta-blockers. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with stable angina pectoris who remained symptomatic despite receiving beta-blockers. Keyword searches of PubMed, The Cochrane Central Library Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Google Scholar identified studies comparing ivabradine plus beta-blockers with placebo or other first- or second-line antianginal agents in patients with stable angina pectoris. No date limits or language restrictions were applied. Outcomes were evaluated after 1 and 4 months of treatment, including changes in HR, angina attacks, use of short-acting nitrates, quality of life and safety. Risk of bias was evaluated on the basis of recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Seven relevant studies were identified (N = 6821). Ivabradine plus a beta-blocker consistently reduced HR, anginal symptoms and short-acting nitrate consumption within 1 month of initiating therapy, with continued reductions for up to 4 months. Furthermore, ivabradine plus beta-blocker therapy was well tolerated, with bradycardia rarely reported (0.1% of patients overall). This study is limited by the inclusion of only two randomised studies, which may lead to result interpretation bias. Ivabradine may be valuable for tailoring early antianginal treatment when used in combination with beta-blockers for chronic stable angina inadequately controlled by beta-blockers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nedoshivin et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Stable angina pectoris (n=6,821). Ivabradine plus beta-blockers vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on Difference from baseline in heart rate after 1 month (Mean difference -12.6 bpm, p=<0.0001). Ivabradine in combination with beta-blockers significantly reduced heart rate by 12.6 bpm from baseline within 1 month in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: