Key result
Normobaric hypoxia does not impair performance or neuromuscular fatigue versus normoxia during repeated Wingate protocols.
Why the study?
The effect of longer recovery between repeated high-intensity intervals in hypoxic conditions is unclear, and data on these intervals in hypoxia in women are scarce.
Does normobaric hypoxia affect performance and neuromuscular fatigue during repeated Wingate tests in triathletes compared to normoxia?
RCT (n=12)
Blinded
Randomised crossover
Does normobaric hypoxia affect performance and neuromuscular fatigue during repeated Wingate tests in triathletes compared to normoxia?
A repeated Wingate protocol with 7-minute recovery in normobaric hypoxia does not negatively impact performance, neuromuscular fatigue, or perceived exertion in triathletes compared to normoxia, regardless of sex.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normobaric hypoxia remains viable for repeated sprint training in triathletes; extends RCT evidence on hypoxia tolerance during anaerobic intervals.
Background: Repeated high-intensity intervals under normoxic (NOR) and hypoxic (HYP) conditions is a training strategy used by athletes. Although different protocols have been used, the effect of longer recovery between repetitions is unclear. In addition, information on the effect of repeated high-intensity intervals on HYP in women is scarce. Aims: To analyse the differences between sexes and between conditions (NOR and HYP) in Repeated Wingate (RW) performance and neuromuscular fatigue in triathletes. Methods: A total of 12 triathletes (men: n = 7, 23.00 ± 4.04 years; women: n = 5, 20.40 ± 3.91) participated in this randomised, blinded, crossover study. In two separate sessions over seven days, participants performed 3 × 30” all out with 7′ of recovery in randomised NOR (fraction of inspired oxygen: ≈20%; ≈300 m altitude) and HYP (fraction of inspired oxygen: ≈15.5%; ≈2500 m altitude) conditions. Before and after RW, vertical jump tests were performed to assess neuromuscular fatigue. Oxygen saturation, power, perceived exertion, muscle soreness and heart rate parameters were assessed. Results: Significant differences were reported between sexes in the parameters of vertical jump, oxygen saturation, RW performance and heart rate (p < 0.05). However, between conditions (NOR and HYP), only differences in oxygen saturation were reported (p < 0.05). No significant differences were reported between conditions (NOR and HYP) in RW performance, neuromuscular fatigue, muscle soreness and perception of exertion. Conclusions: A 3 × 30” RW protocol with 7′ recovery in HYP could have no negative consequences on performance, neuromuscular fatigue and perception of exertion in triathletes compared to NOR, independently of sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toro-Román et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy triathletes (n=12). Normobaric hypoxia vs. Normoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen: ≈20%; ≈300 m altitude) was evaluated on Repeated Wingate (RW) performance and neuromuscular fatigue. Normobaric hypoxia during a 3 × 30-second repeated Wingate protocol with 7-minute recovery did not negatively affect performance or neuromuscular fatigue compared to normoxia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: