Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The yeast S-II null mutant is viable, but the mutation induces sensitivity to 6-azauracil. To examine whether the region needed for stimulation of RNA polymerase II and that for suppression of 6-azauracil sensitivity in the S-II molecule could be separated, we constructed various deletion mutants of S-II and expressed them in the null mutant using the GAL1 promoter to see if the mutant proteins suppressed 6-azauracil sensitivity. We also expressed these constructs in Escherichia coli, purified the mutant proteins to homogeneity, and examined if they stimulated RNA polymerase II. We found that a mutant protein lacking the first 147 amino acid residues suppressed 6-azauracil sensitivity but that removal of 2 additional residues completely abolished the suppression. A mutant protein lacking the first 141 residues had activity to stimulate RNA polymerase II, whereas removal of 10 additional residues completely abolished this activity. We also examined arrest-relief activity of these mutant proteins and found that there is a good correlation between RNA polymerase II-stimulating activity and arrest-relief activity. Therefore, at least the last 168 residues of S-II are sufficient for expressing these three activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakanishi et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: