Key result
HRV parameters fail to serve as reliable surrogate markers for chronic pain intensity.
Why the study?
No generally accepted objective biomarker has qualified as a surrogate marker for pain intensity in the chronic pain setting.
Is heart rate variability a suitable surrogate marker for pain intensity in patients with chronic pain?
Cross-Sectional (n=366)
Yes
Is heart rate variability a suitable surrogate marker for pain intensity in patients with chronic pain?
Heart rate variability parameters are not suitable surrogate markers for pain intensity in patients with chronic pain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HRV parameters lack validity as surrogates for chronic pain intensity; leaves open the search for validated objective markers.
The search towards more objective outcome measurements and consequently surrogate markers for pain started decades ago; however, no generally accepted biomarker for pain has qualified yet. The goal is to explore the value of heart rate variability (HRV) as surrogate marker for pain intensity chronic pain setting. Pain intensity scores and HRV were collected in 366 patients with chronic pain, through a cross-sectional multicenter study. Pain intensity was measured with both the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale, whereas 16 statistical HRV parameters were derived. Canonical correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between the dependent pain variables and the HRV parameters. Surrogacy was determined for each HRV parameter with point estimates between 0 and 1 whereby values close to 1 indicate a strong association between the surrogate and the true endpoint at the patient level. Weak correlations were revealed between HRV parameters and pain intensity scores. The highest surrogacy point estimate was found for mean heart rate as marker for average pain intensity on the numeric rating scale with point estimates of 0.0961 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0384-0.1537) and 0.0209 (95% CI 0-0.05) for patients without medication use and with medication, respectively. This study indicated that HRV parameters as separate entities are no suitable surrogacy candidates for pain intensity, in a population of chronic pain patients. Further potential surrogate candidates and clinical robust true endpoints should be explored, to find a surrogate measure for the highly individual pain experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moens et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic pain (n=366). Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters vs. Self-reported pain intensity (VAS and NRS) was evaluated on Individual-level surrogacy (R²indiv) of mean heart rate for average pain intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale in patients without medication use (Point estimate 0.0961, 95% CI 0.0384-0.1537). Heart rate variability parameters demonstrated weak correlations with pain intensity scores, yielding a maximum individual-level surrogacy point estimate of 0.0961, indicating they are not suitable surrogate markers for chronic pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: