Key result
A convolutional neural network model using ECG and initial blood tests safely ruled out 30-day acute myocardial infarction or death in 55.0% of emergency department chest pain patients, compared to 47.2% using the ESC 0 h algorithm.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning models using presentation data to identify acute myocardial infarction or death within 30 days in ED chest pain patients.
Does a machine learning model using ECG and initial blood tests improve the early rule-out and rule-in of 30-day AMI or death in ED chest pain patients compared to the ESC 0 h algorithm?
Observational (n=9,519)
Yes
Does a machine learning model using ECG and initial blood tests improve the early rule-out and rule-in of 30-day AMI or death in ED chest pain patients compared to the ESC 0 h algorithm?
Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 47.2%
A machine learning model incorporating age, sex, ECG, and initial blood tests can safely rule out or rule in 30-day AMI or death in a larger proportion of ED chest pain patients than the standard ESC 0 h algorithm.
May expand safe rule-out in ED chest pain; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) models for identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or death within 30 days among emergency department (ED) chest pain patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from 9519 consecutive ED chest pain patients, we created ML models based on logistic regression or artificial neural networks. Model inputs included sex, age, ECG and the first blood tests at patient presentation: High sensitivity TnT (hs-cTnT), glucose, creatinine, and hemoglobin. For a safe rule-out, the models were adapted to achieve a sensitivity > 99% and a negative predictive value (NPV) > 99.5% for 30-day AMI/death. For rule-in, we set the models to achieve a specificity > 90% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of > 70%. The models were also compared with the 0 h arm of the European Society of Cardiology algorithm (ESC 0 h); An initial hs-cTnT < 5 ng/L for rule-out and ≥ 52 ng/L for rule-in. A convolutional neural network was the best model and identified 55% of the patients for rule-out and 5.3% for rule-in, while maintaining the required sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV levels. ESC 0 h failed to reach these performance levels. DISCUSSION: An ML model based on age, sex, ECG and blood tests at ED arrival can identify six out of ten chest pain patients for safe early rule-out or rule-in with no need for serial blood tests. Future studies should attempt to improve these ML models further, e.g. by including additional input data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capretz et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute chest pain (n=9,519). Convolutional neural network (CNN-MB) diagnostic model vs. ESC 0 h algorithm was evaluated on Proportion of patients safely ruled out for 30-day AMI or death (sensitivity >99%, NPV >99.5%). A convolutional neural network model using ECG and initial blood tests safely ruled out 30-day acute myocardial infarction or death in 55.0% of emergency department chest pain patients, compared to 47.2% using the ESC 0 h algorithm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: