Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, two interesting complexity classes, PP and ⊕ P, are compared with PH, the polynomial-time hierarchy. It is shown that every set in PH is polynomial-time Turing reducible to a set in PP, and PH is included in BP · ⊕ P. As a consequence of the results, it follows that PP ⊆ PH (or ⊕ P ⊆ PH) implies a collapse of PH. A stronger result is also shown: every set in PP(PH) is polynomial-time Turing reducible to a set in PP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seinosuke Toda (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: