Key result
Adherence to 7 secondary prevention guidelines after acute myocardial infarction was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to 0-3 guidelines (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49-0.66).
Why the study?
The survival benefit associated with cumulative adherence to multiple clinical and lifestyle-related guideline recommendations for secondary prevention after AMI was not well established.
Does cumulative adherence to secondary prevention guidelines reduce all-cause death in adults surviving acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=25,778)
Does cumulative adherence to secondary prevention guidelines reduce all-cause death in adults surviving acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.57 (95% CI 0.49–0.66)
Cumulative adherence to secondary prevention guidelines after acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant dose-dependent improvement in long-term survival.
Supports promoting full post-MI guideline adherence; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background The survival benefit associated with cumulative adherence to multiple clinical and lifestyle-related guideline recommendations for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not well established. Methods and Results We examined adults with AMI (mean age 68 years; 64% men) surviving at least 30 (N=25 778) or 90 (N=24 200) days after discharge in a large integrated healthcare system in Northern California from 2008 to 2014. The association between all-cause death and adherence to 6 or 7 secondary prevention guideline recommendations including medical treatment (prescriptions for β-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, lipid medications, and antiplatelet medications), risk factor control (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL), and lifestyle approaches (not smoking) at 30 or 90 days after AMI was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. To allow patients time to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL, this metric was examined only among those alive 90 days after AMI. Overall guideline adherence was high (35% and 34% met 5 or 6 guidelines at 30 days; and 31% and 23% met 6 or 7 at 90 days, respectively). Greater guideline adherence was independently associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.49-0.66] for those meeting 7 and hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.61-0.78] for those meeting 6 guidelines versus 0 to 3 guidelines in 90-day models, with similar results in the 30-day models), with significantly lower mortality per each additional guideline recommendation achieved. Conclusions In a large community-based population, cumulative adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy, risk factor control, and lifestyle changes after AMI was associated with improved long-term survival. Full adherence was associated with the greatest survival benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=25,778). Adherence to 6 or 7 secondary prevention guideline recommendations vs. Adherence to 0 to 3 guidelines was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.66). Adherence to 7 secondary prevention guidelines after acute myocardial infarction was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to 0-3 guidelines (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49-0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: