Key result
Early-born soccer players show greater maturity but no advantage in strength, speed, or technical skills.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare somatic maturity, anthropometry, strength, speed, and soccer-specific technical skills among young soccer academy players born in different quarters of the same calendar year.
Do early-born young soccer players differ from late-born peers in somatic maturity, anthropometry, strength, speed, and technical skills?
Cross-Sectional (n=678)
Yes
Do early-born young soccer players differ from late-born peers in somatic maturity, anthropometry, strength, speed, and technical skills?
Early-born youth soccer players are more physically mature than late-born peers but do not show significant advantages in physical or technical performance, highlighting a relative age effect in academy selection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maturity bias may distort youth soccer selection despite equivalent performance; leaves open longitudinal effects on talent pathways.
The aim of the study was to compare the status of somatic maturity, anthropometry, strength, speed, and soccer-specific technical skills of players from leading youth soccer academies born in different quarters of the same calendar year. A total of 678 young male soccer players from eight leading Russian soccer academies took part in the study. The following anthropometric measures and physical characteristics were measured: height, weight, body mass index, countermovement jumps (CMJ), 5, 10, and 20 m sprints, speed dribbling, foot and body ball juggling, and short and long pass accuracy. The determination of somatic maturity as a percentage of projected adult height was collected. All subject dates of birth were divided into four quartiles according to the month of birth. The analysis of all data obtained was conducted both within the total sample and by quartiles of birth, according to the age group categories of 12–13 years, 14–15 years, and 16–17 years and the degree of somatic maturity. There was a widespread relative age effect, with 43.5% of early-born players and only 9.6% of late-born players representing the sample. Early-born players were more mature than late-born players (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) but had no statistically significant differences in strength, speed, or soccer-specific skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezuglov et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy young soccer players (n=678). Early birth quarter vs. Late birth quarter was evaluated on Somatic maturity, strength, speed, and soccer-specific skills (p=<0.001). Early-born young soccer players were significantly more mature than late-born players (p<0.001), but demonstrated no significant differences in strength, speed, or soccer-specific technical skills.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: