Key result
Measurement site and type of pulse feature significantly impacted the overall time shift and intra-subject time shift variability of filtered photoplethysmography signals (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Filtering can distort PPG signal morphology and change feature timing, prompting investigation into how measurement site and pulse feature type affect filtering-induced time shifts.
Does filtering of PPG signals induce time shifts in pulse features measured at different body sites in healthy adults?
Observational (n=36)
Does filtering of PPG signals induce time shifts in pulse features measured at different body sites in healthy adults?
Measurement site and type of pulse feature significantly influence the timing of feature points on filtered PPG signals, highlighting the need to standardize and report filtering parameters in PPG studies.
Site-specific PPG filtering may distort pulse timing; leaves open standardization needs for future studies.
Objective. The waveform of a photoplethysmography (PPG) signal depends on the measurement site and individual physiological conditions. Filtering can distort the morphology of the original PPG signal waveform and change the timing of pulse feature points on PPG signals. We aim to quantitatively investigate the effect of PPG signal morphology (related to measurement site) and type of pulse feature on the filtering-induced time shift (TS). Approach. 60 s PPG signals were measured from six body sites (finger, wrist under (volar), wrist upper (dorsal), earlobe, and forehead) of 36 healthy adults. Using infinite impulse response digital filters which are common in PPG signal processing, PPG signals were prefiltered (band-pass, pass and stop bands: >0.5 Hz and <0.2 Hz for high-pass filter, <20 Hz and >30 Hz for low-pass filter) and then filtered (low-pass, pass and stop bands: <3 Hz and >5 Hz). Four pulse feature points were defined and extracted (peak, valley, maximal first derivative, and maximal second derivative). For each subject, overall TS and intra-subject TS variability in feature points were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of TS between prefiltered and filtered PPG signals in 50 cardiac cycles. Statistical testing was performed to investigate the effect of measurement site and type of pulse feature on overall TS and intra-subject TS variability. Main results. Measurement site, type of pulse feature, and their interaction had significant impacts on the overall TS and intra-subject TS variability ( p < 0.001 for all). Valley and maximal second derivative showed higher overall TS than peak and maximal first derivative. Finger had higher overall TS and lower intra-subject TS variability than other measurement sites. Significance . Measurement site and type of pulse feature can significantly influence the timing of feature points on filtered PPG signals. Filtering parameters should be quoted to support the reproducibility of PPG-related studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=36). Measurement site and pulse feature type was evaluated on Overall time shift (TS) and intra-subject TS variability (p=<0.001). Measurement site and type of pulse feature significantly impacted the overall time shift and intra-subject time shift variability of filtered photoplethysmography signals (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: