Key result
Feature-based indices derived from photoplethysmogram signals, including signal quality and pulse transit time, depend significantly on the body location of the sensor.
Why the study?
PPG time domain features and pulse transit time have potential clinical applications, but how these parameters depend on PPG sensor location is less well known.
Does PPG sensor location affect feature-based indices derived from PPG signals in healthy volunteers during lower body negative pressure?
Observational (n=36)
No
Does PPG sensor location affect feature-based indices derived from PPG signals in healthy volunteers during lower body negative pressure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Various indices derived from PPG signals are significantly influenced by sensor placement, highlighting the need for caution when extrapolating findings across different body sites in digital health applications.
Objective Various time domain features, including dicrotic notch ( dic ), in photoplethysmogram (PPG), and the pulse transit time (PTT) determined using the simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram (ECG), are believed to have a critical role with many potential clinical applications. However, the dependence of these parameters on PPG sensor location is less well known. Approach Three transmissive pulse oximetry probes (Xhale) were put simultaneously on the ear, nose, and finger of 36 healthy volunteers in the lower body negative pressure (LBNP) experiment. Various features of the recorded PPG signals were analyzed across different LBNP phases for each location. Simultaneously recorded finger PPG and ECG (Nellcor) were used to assess the dependence of PTT on PPG sensor location. Main Results PPG signal quality varies by measurement site, with nasal PPG showing the highest quality and ear PPG the lowest. Except pulse rate (PR), most feature-related indices differ across sites. Specifically, the ratios of detectable dic vary, highest in finger PPG and lowest in nasal PPG. When dic is detectable, the e point and dic are significantly different. Pulse rate variability indices and PTT also vary by location, though no clear conclusions can be drawn about PTT behavior across different LBNP phases. Significance Various indices derived from PPG signals in a well-controlled study environment are influenced by sensor placement. Although not all possible indices are examined, the findings clearly illustrate the sensitivity of signal features to measurement location. While these results may not be directly generalizable to routine clinical settings, caution is warranted when extrapolating findings from one PPG site to another. This consideration is especially important in the digital health era, where mobile devices with PPG sensors are increasingly deployed at diverse body sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chand et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=36). Photoplethysmogram sensor location (ear, nose, finger) vs. Comparison among locations was evaluated on Comparison of feature-related indices (including signal quality index and detectable dicrotic notch) across different body locations (p=<10-10). Feature-based indices derived from photoplethysmogram signals, including signal quality and pulse transit time, depend significantly on the body location of the sensor.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: