Why the study?
Do the kinetics of flow-mediated dilation correlate with cardiovascular risk factor burden and early atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects?
Do the kinetics of flow-mediated dilation correlate with cardiovascular risk factor burden and early atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects?
The maximum rate of flow-mediated dilation appears to be a more sensitive marker of endothelial performance and cardiovascular risk than the traditional measurement of dilation magnitude.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to analyze flow-mediated dilation (FMD) time-course in response to forearm occlusion in the clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 50 asymptomatic subjects, monitoring software measuring continuous beat-to-beat change in brachial artery diameter was used to determine FMD magnitude in percentage change in peak diameter from baseline (FMD-DeltaD), time to peak diameter after occlusion release (FMD-t(peak)), integrated FMD response calculated as area under dilation curve (FMD-AUC), maximum FMD rate calculated as maximal slope of dilation (FMD-MDR). FMD-DeltaD and FMD-MDR correlated positively with peak wall shear stress (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). FMD-MDR correlated negatively with age (P < 0.001), Framingham risk score (P < 0.01) and carotid intima-media thickness (P < 0.05), while FMD-DeltaD correlated negatively with Framingham risk score only (P < 0.01). After adjustment, all these correlations were independent of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and antidiabetic therapies. All but that of FMD-MDR with intima-media thickness were also found in a subgroup of 29 untreated subjects and in a subgroup of 24 untreated and low-risk (FRS < 10%) subjects. FMD-t(peak) and FMD-AUC were not associated with shear stimulus, Framingham risk score, and intima-media thickness. CONCLUSION: The kinetics of dilation (maximum rate) seem more sensitive than their magnitude in assessing FMD performance and its determinants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chironi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: