Key result
A longer baseline PA-TDI interval was significantly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence over 12 months following ablation (163.9±11.0 ms vs. 151.1±14.6 ms without recurrence, P=0.0189).
Why the study?
Does the baseline PA-TDI interval predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=33)
Does the baseline PA-TDI interval predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
The PA-TDI interval, reflecting total atrial conduction time, may serve as a useful echocardiographic predictor for atrial fibrillation recurrence following ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support echocardiographic risk stratification after AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction Acute and mid‐term effects of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) on left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) function and the atrial electromechanical interval are controversial. Methods Echocardiographic variables and the PA‐TDI interval (time from ECG lead II P‐wave onset to lateral a′ wave on tissue Doppler tracings, indicating the total atrial conduction time [TACT]) were evaluated in 33 paroxysmal AF patients before, 1 day, and 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. Results During a 12‐month follow‐up, 10 (30.3%) patients had recurrent AF, associated with a greater baseline LA volume (LAV) (48.4±19.3 mm 3 vs. 38.7±11.4 mm 3 , P =0.0811) and PA‐TDI interval (163.9±11.0 ms vs. 151.1±14.6 ms, P =0.0189) than in patients without AF recurrence. By 6 months after ablation, LAV had decreased progressively in the non‐recurrence group (27.9±8.1 mm 3 , P <0.0001 vs. baseline), but the decrease was modestly significant in the recurrence group (36.3±7.5 cm 3 , P =0.0380). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) modestly increased 1 day after ablation in both groups and remained unchanged in the non‐recurrence group (67.9±8.1% at baseline to 70.5±5.9% at 12 months, P =0.1711), whereas it decreased gradually below the baseline value in the recurrence group (68.2±11.3% to 60.9±13.6%, P =0.1025). The PA‐TDI interval did not change during follow‐up in either group, but remained longer in the recurrence group. Conclusions The PA‐TDI interval may be useful for predicting post‐ablation AF recurrences. The patterns of time‐course changes in LAV, LVEF, and TACT differ, but the effects of ablation were better in patients without AF recurrence after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mano et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=33). Atrial fibrillation recurrence vs. No atrial fibrillation recurrence was evaluated on Baseline PA-TDI interval (total atrial conduction time) (p=0.0189). A longer baseline PA-TDI interval was significantly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence over 12 months following ablation (163.9±11.0 ms vs. 151.1±14.6 ms without recurrence, P=0.0189).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: