Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) results in electrical and structural remodeling of the atria, which extent is known to be associated with a higher AF recurrence rate after catheter ablation (CA). Recently, a novel echocardiographic parameter derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) [PA-TDI] has been introduced to assess the total atrial activation time, as a noninvasive surrogate of fibrosis and remodeling. The aim of the study is to investigate the role of PA-TDI interval as a predictor of AF ablation efficacy. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with paroxysmal symptomatic drug-refractory AF referred to our institution for CA procedure, who presented sinus rhythm at admission. A complete transthoracic echocardiogram was performed before the ablation procedure, including the assessment of PA-TDI interval. Results: From January 2015 to April 2018, 128 patients (mean age: 61.86 ± 9.08 years, 68% male, body surface area: 1.97 ± 0.21 mq, body mass index: 26.98 ± 3.86 kg/mq, and ejection fraction: 59% ±6.06%) with symptomatic drug-refractory AF who received radiofrequency CA were enrolled. During the follow-up of 15.80 ± 6.7 months, 30 patients (23%) developed AF recurrence out of the blanking period. Compared with those without recurrence (group 1), patients with recurrence (group 2) had a larger left atrium (LA) size (Group 1 vs. Group 2: mean LA area: 22.2 ± 4.6 cmq vs. 25 ± 6.6 cmq, P = 0.015; mean indexed LA volume: 35 ± 10 mL/mq vs. 40 ± 12 mL/mq, P = 0.04) and longer PA-TDI interval (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 162 ± 33 ms vs. 133 ± 26 ms, P < 0.0001). A cutoff of PA-TDI > 150 ms identified patients with recurrence after ablation with a sensibility of 82% and specificity of 83% (area under the curve 0.879). Conclusions: The total activation time assessed by PA-TDI is an independent predictor of AF recurrence and can be used to predict the efficacy of transcatheter ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barletta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: