Why the study?
Many acute ischemic stroke patients do not achieve a good outcome despite successful reperfusion after thrombectomy.
Does any reperfusion hemorrhage predict poor outcomes at 90 days in acute ischemic stroke patients following successful thrombectomy?
Cohort (n=70)
Does any reperfusion hemorrhage predict poor outcomes at 90 days in acute ischemic stroke patients following successful thrombectomy?
Odds Ratio: 3.3 (95% CI 1.67–5)
p-value: p=0.001
Even with successful revascularization, reperfusion hemorrhage, increased age, higher NIHSS, and delayed arterial puncture remain significant predictors of poor outcomes in late-window ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rees et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with successful thrombectomy (TICI 2b-3) (n=70). Any reperfusion hemorrhage vs. No reperfusion hemorrhage was evaluated on Poor outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6) (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.67 to 5, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: