Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Subject‐sensitive invariantism posits surprising connections between a person's knowledge and features of her environment that are not paradigmatically epistemic features. But which features of a person's environment have this distinctive connection to knowledge? Traditional defenses of subject‐sensitive invariantism emphasize features that matter to the subject of the knowledge‐attribution. Call this pragmatic encroachment . A more radical thesis usually goes ignored: knowledge is sensitive to moral facts, whether or not those moral facts matter to the subject. Call this moral encroachment . This article argues that, insofar as there are good arguments for pragmatic encroachment, there are also good arguments for moral encroachment.
James S. Fritz (Fri,) studied this question.