Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subject‐sensitive invariantism posits surprising connections between a person's knowledge and features of her environment that are not paradigmatically epistemic features. But which features of a person's environment have this distinctive connection to knowledge? Traditional defenses of subject‐sensitive invariantism emphasize features that matter to the subject of the knowledge‐attribution. Call this pragmatic encroachment . A more radical thesis usually goes ignored: knowledge is sensitive to moral facts, whether or not those moral facts matter to the subject. Call this moral encroachment . This article argues that, insofar as there are good arguments for pragmatic encroachment, there are also good arguments for moral encroachment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James S. Fritz (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: