Key result
Ultrasound detects a full stomach in ~16% of fasting surgical patients, showing limited agreement with questionnaires.
Why the study?
Residual gastric content can persist despite preoperative fasting guidelines, but the predictive accuracy of patient-specific risk factors is limited.
Does ultrasound evaluation more reliably identify residual gastric content compared to a comprehensive questionnaire in adult elective surgical patients?
Observational (n=404)
No
Does ultrasound evaluation more reliably identify residual gastric content compared to a comprehensive questionnaire in adult elective surgical patients?
Ultrasound accurately detects residual gastric content and is faster than questionnaire-based assessments, suggesting it may improve patient safety during preoperative evaluation.
Ultrasound may refine gastric assessment beyond questionnaires in elective surgery; leaves open validation against aspiration outcomes before practice change.
Background/Objectives: Despite standard preoperative fasting guidelines, residual gastric content can persist in some patients, increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Multiple patient-specific factors may predict gastric content retention, but their predictive accuracy is limited. We hypothesized that ultrasound would more reliably identify residual gastric content compared to a comprehensive questionnaire and aimed to determine the most practical approach for risk assessment in elective surgical patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study in adult patients scheduled for elective surgery at a single center. All participants adhered to an 8 h fasting period. The primary outcome was the incidence of a “full stomach” on ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included the Perlas risk classification, comparisons of established volume estimation formulas, correlations with self-reported fasting duration, agreement between questionnaire-based predictions and ultrasound findings, and the time efficiency of each method. Multivariable logistic regression and Cohen’s kappa were used for analyses. Results: Data from 404 patients were analyzed. Despite prolonged fasting, 16.3% had a full stomach by ultrasound, suggesting incomplete gastric emptying. Early satiety and cholelithiasis significantly predicted a full stomach; prolonged fasting duration and female sex were protective. Questionnaire-based predictions demonstrated fair agreement with ultrasound (kappa = 0.327). The Michiko formula often yielded negative volumes, highlighting limitations in volume estimations. Ultrasound examination (3 min median) was faster than questionnaire completion (5 min). Conclusions: Ultrasound accurately detects residual gastric content, outperforming questionnaire-based assessments. Integrating it into routine preoperative evaluation may improve patient safety, although research is needed to refine volume estimation formulas and expand feasibility for patients with positioning limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Elective surgery (n=404). Ultrasound evaluation vs. Questionnaire-based predictions was evaluated on Incidence of a 'full stomach' on ultrasound. Ultrasound evaluation detected a full stomach in 16.3% of elective surgical patients despite an 8-hour fast, demonstrating only fair agreement with questionnaire-based predictions (kappa = 0.327).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: