Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To evaluate the role of apolipoprotein (apo) C-I in inhibiting lipoprotein binding to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), a putative lipoprotein remnant receptor, apoC-peptide fragments were prepared by chemical synthesis or by cyanogen bromide cleavage of intact apoC-I. In ligand-blotting assays, peptides corresponding to residues 1-38, 10-57, 20-57, 30-57, and 40-57 proved ineffective, but intact apoC-I was very effective, at inhibiting the binding of apoE-enriched beta-migrating very low density lipoproteins (beta-VLDL) to the LRP. Studies of the displacement of 125I-labeled apoE from apoE-enriched beta-VLDL showed that the largest peptide (residues 10-57) was two-thirds as effective as intact apoC-I; the other peptides were highly ineffective (residues 40-57, 1-38) or only partly effective (residues 20-57, 30-57). Changes in the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and helix content indicated that the largest peptide was similar to apoC-I in lipid binding affinity, while the other peptide fragments showed little or no affinity for either unilamellar or multilamellar vesicles of dimyristoyl-phosphatidylcholine. These findings suggest that the ability of apoC-I fragments to displace apoE from beta-VLDL is largely, but perhaps not exclusively, a reflection of their ability to bind to membranous bilayers and that apoC-I blocking of the interaction between apoE-rich beta-VLDL and the LRP probably involves displacement of a critical amount of the apoE from the surface of this lipoprotein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swaney et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: