Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using limiting dilution analysis, we investigated proliferative responses of UCHL1+ and UCHL1- T cell populations to compare the precursor cell frequencies following recall and alloantigen stimulation, and the complexity of cellular interactions within UCHL1+ and UCHL1- populations. We find high frequencies of recall antigen responses among UCHL1+, but not UCHL1- T cells. In contrast, both populations contain similar frequencies of alloantigen responsive cells. Our results are consistent with single-hit kinetics in recall as well as alloantigen responses and show no complex cellular interactions within the responding populations. In conclusion, the difference between the recall antigen response of UCHL1+ and UCHL1- cells observed in conventional proliferation assays is most probably due to a high frequency of recall antigen-responsive UCHL1+ cells and not to suppressive phenomena in the UCHL1- population. These data suggest that memory T cells are largely of the UCHL1+ phenotype. The relation of post-thymic T cell maturation and differential CD45 expression is briefly discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merkenschlager et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: