Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is an urgent need for accurate and validated methods to measure plasma phosphorylated tau (p-Tau) biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this study, we compared the performance of new commercially available plasma p-Tau217 assay developed by ALZpath to other established p-Tau assays in an autopsy-confirmed sample. We included 72 participants from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders cohort, with antemortem plasma assessments and postmortem neuropathological examination. Plasma p-Tau217 was measured using the single molecule arrays (SIMOA)-based ALZpath immunoassay and plasma p-Tau217 and p-Tau181 were analyzed with mesoscale discovery (MSD)-based immunoassays developed by Lilly Research Laboratories. Plasma biomarkers were compared with densities of post-mortem-assessed amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary changes. Levels of p-Tau217 ALZpath , p-Tau217 Lilly and p-Tau181 Lilly were significantly associated with plaque (partial Spearman ρ = 0.58, ρ = 0.78, ρ = 0.65; p < 0.001) and neurofibrillary (ρ = 0.26, ρ = 0.51, ρ = 0.37; p < 0.05) density scores, adjusting for age, sex, and time of interval between blood sampling and death. All three biomarkers were also significantly associated with plaque density scores (p-Tau217 ALZpath , ρ = 0.53; p-Tau217 Lilly , ρ = 0.73; p-Tau181 Lilly , ρ = 0.59; p < 0.001), when additionally adjusting for neurofibrillary density scores. However, only p-Tau217 Lilly was significantly associated with neurofibrillary density scores (ρ = 0.32, p = 0.022), when adjusting for plaque density scores. The correlations of p-Tau217 ALZpath and p-Tau181 Lilly with plaque density scores were comparable, whereas p-Tau217 Lilly exhibited significantly higher correlations with plaques (p diff ≤0.015) and neurofibrillary changes (p diff ≤0.004) than p-Tau217 ALZpath . While p-Tau217 ALZpath and p-Tau181 Lilly predicted the presence of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC), Braak staging (Braak 0-IV vs. Braak V-VI) and CERAD neuritic plaque classification (low/sparse vs. moderate/frequent) with similar accuracies (area under the curve [AUC] range , 0.74–0.79), p-Tau217 Lilly AUCs were significantly higher (AUC range ,0.82–0.89, p diff ≤0.024) than the AUCs of p-Tau217 ALZpath . In conclusion, p-Tau217 ALZpath exhibited similar performance as p-Tau181 Lilly but its correlations with core measures of AD pathology were significantly lower in comparison with p-Tau217 Lilly . Future studies are warranted to replicate these findings in larger independent cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: