Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The coreceptor hypothesis postulates that physical association of CD4 with the TCR is required for effective signaling for T cell activation. A variety of studies has suggested that the coreceptor function of CD4 allows responses to 10- to 100-fold lower levels of peptide:self MHC class II ligand. We test the hypothesis of CD4 physical association with the TCR in two different ways. First, we use a panel of soluble antibodies directed at different TCR epitopes to activate a cloned T cell line, and show that activation by antibodies directed at a particular TCR epitope can be inhibited by anti-CD4 antibodies binding to a certain CD4 epitope. These effects establish that the interaction of CD4 and the TCR occurs in a specific orientation. Second, we use the same system to provide evidence that the physical association of CD4 with the TCR is required for effective tyrosine phosphorylation of the TCR zeta-chain subunit, presumably reflecting delivery of p56lck (lck) to the TCR. Only anti-TCR antibodies that induce physical association of CD4 with the TCR as monitored by cocapping can induce efficient tyrosine-phosphorylation of the TCR zeta-chain, unless second antibodies are used to force CD4 and the TCR to associate. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of the TCR zeta-chain exactly parallesl physical association in time and drug sensitivity. We conclude from these studies that stimuli that drive physical association of CD4 and the TCR strongly favor T cell activation, supporting the coreceptor hypothesis of CD4 function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dianzani et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: