Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This piece is a response to Philip Swift’s article in this issue, where he critiques issues concerning ethnographic theory raised in my book World: An anthropological examination. Inspired by the work of Donald Davidson, I argue that indeterminacy and underdetermination are conditions for all communication and that, in light of that, a position of metaphysical pluralism provides us with a better account of the conditions of possibility of the ethnographic gesture than the kind of ontological pluralism that Swift espouses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
João de Pina Cabral (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: