Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To develop and validate a nomogram for assessing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women derived from concurrent P det.Qmax and Q max based on radiographic evidence of increased urethral resistance. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired video‐urodynamics and clinical data of 185 women (development cohort) was performed. The P det.Qmax were plotted against Q max and cluster analysis was performed to determine an axis that best divided the definitively obstructed and unobstructed. Using data from a further 350 women (validation cohort), the sensitivity and specificity of the derived criterion was calculated. Finally, the data from both groups was pooled together and using binary logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was produced. Results Of the 535 patients in the two cohorts, (122 [22.8%]) demonstrated radiographic evidence of BOO. Cluster analysis identified the axis that best separates the radiographically obstructed and unobstructed as P det.Qmax = 2* Q max . Using the data from the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for this was calculated as 0.94 and 0.93, respectively. A nomogram, representing the probability of BOO for concurrent P det.Qmax and Q max measurements was derived by pooling data from both cohorts. Alternatively, a female BOO index (BOOIf) may be calculated mathematically using the formula BOOIf = P det.Qmax − 2.2* Q max, that is, BOOIf < 0, <10% probability of obstruction, BOOIf > 5 likely obstructed (50%) and If BOOIf > 18, obstruction almost certain (>90%). Conclusion A female BOO nomogram (the SG nomogram) with high sensitivity and specificity is proposed. The nomogram can be used to stratify the degree of BOO or assess response to treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: