Why the study?
Does dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation improve exercise tolerance in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy with cavity-obliteration?
Does dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation improve exercise tolerance in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy with cavity-obliteration?
Dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation significantly improves exercise capacity, cardiac reserve, and symptoms in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy and cavity obliteration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation in hypertensive LVH with cavity obliteration; extends randomized evidence to this phenotype.
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy with supranormal systolic ejection and distal cavity obliteration (HHCO) can result in debilitating exertional fatigue and dyspnea. Dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation generates discoordinate contraction, which can limit cavity obliteration and thereby increase potential ejection reserve. Accordingly, we hypothesized that pacing may improve exercise tolerance long-term in this syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dual-chamber pacemakers were implanted in 9 patients with exertional dyspnea caused by HHCO. Intrinsic atrial rate was sensed, and ventricular preactivation was achieved by shortening the atrial-ventricular delay. Pacing was on or off for successive 3-month periods (randomized, double-blind, crossover design), followed by 6 additional pacing-on months. Metabolic exercise testing, quality-of-life assessment, and rest and dobutamine-stress echocardiographic/Doppler data were obtained. After 3 months of pacing-on, exercise duration rose from 324+/-133 to 588+/-238 s (mean+/-SD; P=0.001, with 7 of 9 patients improving >/=30%), and maximal oxygen consumption increased from 13.6+/-2.9 to 16.7+/-3.3 mL of O(2). min(-1). kg(-1) (P<0.02). Both parameters were little changed from baseline during the pacing-off period. Improved exercise capacity persisted at 1-year follow-up. Clinical symptoms and activities of daily living improved during the pacing-on period and stayed improved at 1 year, but they were little changed during the pacing-off period. Despite similar basal values, stroke volume (P<0.001) and cardiac output (P<0.02) increased with dobutamine stimulation 2 to 3 times more after 1 year of follow-up as compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term dual-chamber pacing can improve exercise capacity, cardiac reserve, clinical symptoms, and activities of daily living in patients with HHCO. This therapy may provide a novel alternative for patients in whom traditional pharmacological treatment proves inadequate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kass et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: