Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background The importance of reading motivation has led to the development of a large number of self‐report reading motivation measures; however, there is still a need for a usable measure of adolescent reading motivation that captures a large number of theoretically and empirically distinct constructs. Methods The current paper details the development and validation of a computer adapted measure of reading motivation, the Adaptive Reading Motivation Measure (ARMM), which assesses constructs of curiosity, involvement, interest, value, challenge, grades, recognition, competition, avoidance, self‐efficacy, perceived difficulty, preference for autonomy, social motivation, prosocial goals and antisocial goals for reading. Results Model fit indicated that hierarchical multidimensional models fit better than models without a hierarchical structure. The validation results indicate that females scored higher than men and younger students scored higher than older students on most ARMM scores when scores were derived using a higher order model. In addition, these scores correlated significantly to reading behaviour, engagement and achievement and indicated high reliability. Conclusions The findings suggest that the ARMM would be a valid measure to assess a large number of reading motivation constructs in a short period of time within a classroom setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: