Why the study?
How can radiation dosage and fluoroscopy time be reduced during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
How can radiation dosage and fluoroscopy time be reduced during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights the importance of reducing radiation exposure during AF ablation and provides practical instructions on achieving this through system settings and complementary imaging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support low-radiation AF ablation techniques; leaves open prospective validation of outcomes.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation has become the treatment of choice for atrial fibrillation (AF) that does not respond to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. During the procedure, fluoroscopy imaging is still considered essential to visualise catheters in real-time. However, radiation is often ignored by physicians since it is invisible and the long-term risks are underestimated. In this respect, it must be emphasised that radiation exposure has various potentially harmful effects, such as acute skin injury, malignancies and genetic disease, both to patients and physicians. For this reason, every electrophysiologist should be aware of the problem and should learn how to decrease radiation exposure by both changing the setting of the system and using complementary imaging technologies. In this review, we aim to discuss the basics of X-ray exposure and suggest practical instructions for how to reduce radiation dosage during AF ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagata et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: