Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study quasar clustering on small scales, modeling clustering amplitudes using halo-driven dark matter descriptions. From 91 pairs on scales <35 kpc/h, we detect only a slight excess in quasar clustering over our best-fit large-scale model. Integrated across all redshifts, the implied quasar bias is b_Q = 4.21+/-0.98 (b_Q = 3.93+/-0.71) at ~18 kpc/h (~28 kpc/h). Our best-fit (real-space) power index is ~-2 (i.e., \ξ(r) \∝ r⁻²), implying steeper halo profiles than currently found in simulations. Alternatively, quasar binaries with separation <35 kpc/h may trace merging galaxies, with typical dynamical merger times t_d~(610+/-260)m-1/2 Myr/h, for quasars of host halo mass m x 10¹² Msolar/h. We find UVX quasars at ~28 kpc/h cluster >5 times higher at z > 2, than at z < 2, at the 2.0\σ level. However, as the space density of quasars declines as z increases, an excess of quasar binaries (over expectation) at z > 2 could be consistent with reduced merger rates at z > 2 for the galaxies forming UVX quasars. Comparing our clustering at ~28 kpc/h to a \ξ(r)=(r/4.8\)-1.53 power-law, we find an upper limit on any excess of a factor of 4.3+/-1.3, which, noting some caveats, differs from large excesses recently measured for binary quasars, at 2.2\σ. We speculate that binary quasar surveys that are biased to z > 2 may find inflated clustering excesses when compared to models fit at z < 2. We provide details of 111 photometrically classified quasar pairs with separations <0.1'. Spectroscopy of these pairs could significantly constrain quasar dynamics in merging galaxies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myers et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: