Induced polarization of volcanic rocks. 8. The case of intrusive igneous rocks

SUMMARY In the previous papers of this series, we have developed an in-depth analysis of the low-frequency complex conductivity response of volcanic (extrusive) rocks. We showed that the alteration of these rocks plays a key-role in determining their induced polarization properties, especially regarding the formation of smectite in response to the thermo-activated alteration of the volcanic glasses. We also considered the effects associated with the presence of magnetite and pyrite. In this paper, we look at the induced polarization properties of igneous rocks like granites and granitoids. Usually, the alteration path of these rocks leads to the formation of kaolinite, a clay mineral with a much lower Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) than smectite. Thirty-three core samples from three sites in France are saturated with NaCl solutions at three salinities (pore water conductivity of 0.1, 1.0 and 10 S m−1, 25 °C) and their complex conductivity spectra are measured in the frequency range 0.01 Hz–45 kHz. As observed for volcanic rocks, the surface conductivity, normalized chargeability and quadrature conductivity depend strongly on the CEC of the rock, which is independently measured with the cobalt-hexamine method. The (intrinsic) formation factor follows an Archie's type relationship with the connected porosity with a porosity (cementation) exponent of m = 1.70 ± 0.02, much smaller than for volcanic extrusive rocks. Like for volcanic rocks, a dynamic Stern layer model can be used to illustrate the behaviour associated with the clay-minerals (mostly kaolinite). A field investigation is conducted in the Vosges (France) using a deep time-domain induced polarization survey reaching at a depth of investigation ∼400 m. We show how the electrical conductivity and the normalized chargeability can be used to image the water content and CEC of the granitic substratum. The conductivity of granite is found to be dominated by surface conductivity rather than by bulk conductivity and therefore Archie's law cannot be used as a conductivity equation to interpret field data as commonly done in ElectroMagnetic surveys.