Key result
Oral propafenone (600 mg) administered before transesophageal pacing restored sinus rhythm in 66.7% of patients with Type II atrial flutter, compared to 0% without treatment (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does oral propafenone improve the attainment of sinus rhythm during transesophageal pacing in patients with Type II atrial flutter?
RCT (n=12)
randomized
Does oral propafenone improve the attainment of sinus rhythm during transesophageal pacing in patients with Type II atrial flutter?
Oral propafenone facilitates the interruption of Type II atrial flutter by transesophageal pacing, likely by prolonging the cycle length and converting it to a type I flutter.
Supports oral propafenone before transesophageal pacing in Type II atrial flutter; extends RCT evidence for pretreatment to facilitate conversion.
Type II atrial flutter (AFII) is an arrhythmia which usually cannot be interrupted by atrial pacing: the underlying mechanism is considered to be a leading circle without an excitable gap. We investigated whether the administration of propafenone, an antiarrhythmic drug, which primarily decreases conduction velocity, has a beneficial effect on AFII interruption using transesophageal pacing. Twelve patients with an AFII were randomized into 2 groups in which pacing was performed without treatment (group A) or two hours after the administration of 600 mg of oral propafenone (group B). Sinus rhythm was attained in 0 of 6 patients in group A and in 4 of 6 patients in group B (P < 0.05). The baseline mean cycle length was the same in both groups (175 +/- 7 (A) vs 168 +/- 8 ms (B); it lengthened significantly after the administration of propafenone (219 +/- 33 vs 168 +/- 8 ms; P < 0.05). Propafenone did not significantly lengthen the cycle in the two patients in whom interruption of the arrhythmia was impossible. Our data show that propafenone has a facilitating effect on atrial pacing only when it significantly prolongs the cycle length of the arrhythmia, possible expression of a conversion of AFII into type I, with an anatomical substrate and an excitable gap allowing arrhythmia capture and interruption. In the two patients in whom sinus rhythm was not restored, the absence of a direct dependence of the cycle length on the change in conduction velocity induced by propafenone may be explained by the persistence of a functionally determined circuit, resistant to atrial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doni et al. (1996) conducted an RCT in Type II atrial flutter (n=12). Propafenone and transesophageal pacing vs. Transesophageal pacing without treatment was evaluated on Attainment of sinus rhythm (p=< 0.05). Oral propafenone (600 mg) administered before transesophageal pacing restored sinus rhythm in 66.7% of patients with Type II atrial flutter, compared to 0% without treatment (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: