Key result
Goalkeepers demonstrated a significantly lower maximal oxygen uptake (p = 0.021) and supine vagal activity compared to outfield players, and along with central defenders, were significantly heavier and taller.
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
No
Examines fitness differences among soccer player positions, highlighting specific profile variations.
Background: In order to optimize training in soccer, knowledge about the specific position fitness demands and characteristics is required. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine whether there are position specific differences in somatic, cardiorespiratory and autonomic cardiac profiles of professional senior Czech soccer players. Methods: All players (N = 120) were divided into six groups according to field positions: goalkeeper (GK; n = 11), external defenders (ED; n = 15), central defenders (CD; n = 18), external midfielders (EM; n = 18), central midfielders (CM; n = 24) and forwards (F; n = 34). Players underwent anthropometrical and heart rate variability (HRV) assessment, and a maximal incremental running test in order to obtain maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and heart rate. HRV variables were transformed using the natural logarithm (Ln). Results: GK and CD were significantly (p = .005) heavier than ED, EM, CM, and F; while F were significantly (p = .026) heavier than CM and EM. GK and CD were significantly (p = .008) taller than ED, EM, CM, F; and EM were significantly (p = .041) shorter than CM and F. The only significant (p = .043) difference in percentage of body fat was observed in CD compared with CM. A significantly (p = .021) lower VO2max was observed for GK compared with ED, CD, EM, CM, and F. Supine HRV was significantly (p = .039) lower for Ln LF/HF in GK compared with F. Standing HRV was significantly (p = .03) lower for Ln LF in CD compared with both ED and F, significantly (p = .028) higher for Ln LF/HF in ED compared with CD and EM. Conclusions: In soccer, specific positions are associated with different height, body mass and aerobic capacity. A lower VO2max and vagal activity in GK compared with other playing positions may not be considered as disadvantage for performance in this specific playing position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Semjon et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy professional soccer players (n=120). Playing position vs. Other playing positions was evaluated on Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) (p=0.021). Goalkeepers demonstrated a significantly lower maximal oxygen uptake (p = 0.021) and supine vagal activity compared to outfield players, and along with central defenders, were significantly heavier and taller.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: