Women returning to work after an ACS event require substantial support and guidance, highlighting a potential gap in current formal cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Women post-ACS may need individualized non-rehab support to resume work; leaves open whether redesigned cardiac rehabilitation improves return-to-work outcomes.
Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the transition experiences of Australian women in resuming paid employment after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. Background: Until recently cardiovascular research has focused predominantly on men but this is changing and research exploring women’s experiences of ACS has increased. Despite knowing that many women do not resume paid employment following an ACS event, little is known about the experience of those women who do, even though it is understood that returning to the previous level of employment after an ACS event is a positive outcome. Design: An exploratory qualitative approach underpinned by naturalistic inquiry was undertaken. Methods: A purposive sample of seven women who had experienced their first ACS event 12 months ago was selected. Each woman was interviewed using a semi–structured format and their interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the transcript set and conceptual mapping were employed to formulate key themes. Findings: All women (mean age 52.6 years) resumed paid employment at various stages during their recovery, but reported similar transition processes. Three key themes representing this process were identified: primary motivation; influence through guidance and support; and resuming paid employment. Conclusions: Study findings revealed that these women required substantial support from family, friends and employers, with ongoing guidance from health professionals to return to paid work. The timeframes for their return varied and some modified their roles within the workforce to enable them to return to paid work. However, formal cardiac rehabilitation did not appear to have a significant impact on these participants’ decisions to return to work. They felt that more information about this decision may have been helpful if given at the time of cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parry et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: