Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proteins named 14-3-3 can bind more than 200 different proteins, mostly (but not exclusively) when they are at a phosphorylated state. These partner proteins are involved in different cellular processes, such as cell signaling, transcription factors, cellular morphology, and metabolism; this suggests pleiotropic functionality for 14-3-3 proteins. Recent efforts to establish a rational classification of 14-3-3 binding partners showed neither structural nor functional relatedness in this group of proteins. Using three natural predictors of disorder in proteins, and the structural available information, we show that >90% of 14-3-3 protein partners contain disordered regions. This percentage is significantly high when compared with recent studies on cell signaling and cancer-related proteins or RNA chaperons. More important, almost all 14-3-3-binding sites are inside disordered regions, this reinforcing the importance of structural disorder in this class of proteins. We also propose that a disorder-to-order transition occurs in the binding of 14-3-3 proteins with their partners. We discuss the consequences of the latter for consensus binding sequences, specificity, affinity, and thermodynamic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bustos et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: