Key result
CardioClick, a telehealth primary cardiovascular disease prevention program, significantly increased the completion rate of the prevention program to 64.4% compared to 39.2% for historical in-person care.
Why the study?
Telehealth use has expanded in specialty clinics, but evidence regarding its outcomes in primary cardiovascular disease prevention remains limited.
Does a telehealth clinical pathway (CardioClick) improve patient engagement and reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors compared to traditional in-person care in high-risk South Asian patients?
Observational (n=559)
No
Does a telehealth clinical pathway (CardioClick) improve patient engagement and reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors compared to traditional in-person care in high-risk South Asian patients?
A telehealth-based preventive cardiology program significantly increased patient engagement and achieved comparable or superior reductions in cardiovascular risk factors compared to traditional in-person care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase CVD prevention engagement via telehealth; hypothesis-generating for risk reduction, pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Telehealth use has increased in specialty clinics, but there is limited evidence on the outcomes of telehealth in primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the initial outcomes of CardioClick, a telehealth primary CVD prevention program. METHODS: In 2017, the Stanford South Asian Translational Heart Initiative (a preventive cardiology clinic focused on high-risk South Asian patients) introduced CardioClick, which is a clinical pathway replacing in-person follow-up visits with video visits. We assessed patient engagement and changes in CVD risk factors in CardioClick patients and in a historical in-person cohort from the same clinic. RESULTS: In this study, 118 CardioClick patients and 441 patients who received in-person care were included. CardioClick patients were more likely to complete the clinic's CVD prevention program (76/118, 64.4% vs 173/441, 39.2%, respectively; P<.001) and they did so in lesser time (mean, 250 days vs 307 days, respectively; P<.001) than the patients in the historical in-person cohort. Patients who completed the CardioClick program achieved reductions in CVD risk factors, including blood pressure, lipid concentrations, and BMI, which matched or exceeded those observed in the historical in-person cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can be used to deliver care effectively in a preventive cardiology clinic setting and may result in increased patient engagement. Further studies on telehealth outcomes are needed to determine the optimal role of virtual care models across diverse preventive medicine clinics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalwani et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Primary cardiovascular disease prevention (n=559). CardioClick (telehealth primary CVD prevention program) vs. Historical in-person care cohort was evaluated on Completion of the clinic's CVD prevention program (p=<0.001). CardioClick, a telehealth primary cardiovascular disease prevention program, significantly increased the completion rate of the prevention program to 64.4% compared to 39.2% for historical in-person care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: