Why the study?
Limited data on the periprocedural risk and success rate of catheter ablation in HCM make procedural qualification and decision-making challenging.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This case report highlights the complex decision-making and importance of informed consent regarding catheter ablation in HCM patients with symptomatic AF.
We present the case of a young patient with significant left ventricular hypertrophy as a common representation of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenotype. The clinical presentation and diagnostic route of the disease (despite negative genotype), which can be found in everyday cardiology practice, are shown. Despite the presence of guidelines on this topic, each clinical case is demanding, especially during qualification for invasive procedures. Limited data about the periprocedural risk of catheter ablation and success rate in HCM makes physician decisions for this type of patient challenging. The importance of informed consent and how the patient’s decisions affet further progress are also shown. JRCD 2018; 4 (1): 18-21.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gębka et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=1). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation was evaluated on Clinical symptoms and arrhythmia recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: