Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.
Tripathi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.