Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study examined reliability and validity of the researcher-developed 17-item Evidence-Based Practice Self-efficacy (EBPSE) scale. Design: A quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design with comparison group was applied. Setting: Setting included inpatient, ambulatory, long-term care, and hospice units from a large US academic medical center and affiliated sites (n = 14). Sample: Two cohorts of staff (26%) and leadership nurses (74%) participated in a 1-year educational program on clinical informatics and evidence-based practice (EBP) (cohort 1, n = 53, 2007-2008; cohort 2, n = 40, 2008-2009). Methods: The EBPSE scale involves a 1% to 100% response scale, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Both cohorts completed the EBPSE scale at baseline (time 1) and after the clinical informatics content (time 2); cohort 1 also completed the scale at program completion after delivery of EBP content (time 3). Analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings: Missing data ranged from 10% to 17% for participants at time 2 and 43% for cohort 1 at time 3. Cronbach α coefficients ranged from .95 to .98 across time and cohorts. Baseline and time 2 average EBPSE scale scores did not differ between cohorts. Average scores increased significantly (P < .01) from time 1 to time 2 (all participants) and time 2 to time 3 (cohort 1). Conclusions: Findings suggest promise for the EBPSE scale as a measure of EBPSE and target for practice improvements. Further study is needed with a larger small sample and less attrition. Implications: The EBPSE scale may foster leading EBP and mentoring nursing staff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tucker et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: